Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1102 [2009/11/03 13:18] – x500_szutz003
+++ classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1102 [2009/11/06 10:28] (current) – myers
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ===John Galt 8:16 PM 11/02/09===
 Magnetic angular momentum is responsible for spin-orbit coupling which is, I believe, the interaction between the magnetic field of the particles with eachother... I think M has to do with this as well as the Zeeman effect... Oops! Wikipedia just informed me that L and S are responsible for spin-orbit coupling, while M is involved with the Zeeman effect... I am going to read these articles more thoroughly and come back and edit this post. I am having a tough time seeing how M doesn't effect spin-orbit coupling while it does effect the shape of the probability orbitals.
 ====Green Suit 11/02 1:40====
 In spherical coordinates, are we most interested in the Volume, Surface Area, both, or neither? What is the interpreted significance if any? ie Is the volume related to the expectation value, allowed energies, ect?
@@ Line 26: / Line 25: @@
 === Spherical Chicken ===
-My understanding of why we did spherical coordinates was mostly to be able to have the value r -- which is significant because the potential dissipates mostly as a function of R -- so that's why we want the to translate the 3D wave into spherical.
+My understanding of why we did spherical coordinates was mostly to be able to have the value r -- which is significant because the potential dissipates mostly as a function of R -- so that's why we want the to translate the 3D wave into spherical, not necessarily because we're always interested in the volume - (or whatever surface area is).
+===spillane===
+Anybody else use a Mac to edit these pages? If so do you have issues?
+===Esquire 11/06/09 10:28===
+I use a mac to edit without any trouble. What browser are you using?

User Tools

Differences

Page Tools