Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1102 [2009/11/02 10:28] – x500_dues0009 | classes:2009:fall:phys4101.001:q_a_1102 [2009/11/06 10:28] (current) – myers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| < | < | ||
| + | ===John Galt 8:16 PM 11/02/09=== | ||
| + | Magnetic angular momentum is responsible for spin-orbit coupling which is, I believe, the interaction between the magnetic field of the particles with eachother... I think M has to do with this as well as the Zeeman effect... Oops! Wikipedia just informed me that L and S are responsible for spin-orbit coupling, while M is involved with the Zeeman effect... I am going to read these articles more thoroughly and come back and edit this post. I am having a tough time seeing how M doesn' | ||
| + | ====Green Suit 11/02 1:40==== | ||
| + | In spherical coordinates, | ||
| + | ===chavez 2:30pm 11/02/09=== | ||
| + | The volume is important. In the 1D case we dealt with integrals like < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Spherical Chicken === | ||
| + | My understanding of why we did spherical coordinates was mostly to be able to have the value r -- which is significant because the potential dissipates mostly as a function of R -- so that's why we want the to translate the 3D wave into spherical, not necessarily because we're always interested in the volume - (or whatever surface area is). | ||
| + | ===spillane=== | ||
| + | Anybody else use a Mac to edit these pages? If so do you have issues? | ||
| - | + | ===Esquire 11/06/09 10:28=== | |
| + | I use a mac to edit without any trouble. What browser are you using? | ||